Visual comparisons for engineering workflows, using the final benchmark’s validation index, cost per task, and task duration.
Highlights
Leading models at a glance
Overall index
Overall index
Performance landscape
Every model plotted against performance, so the tradeoff is visible at a glance — not just the ranking.
How to read this chart+
Each point is one model, colored by provider — click a provider in the legend below the chart to isolate it. The dotted line connects the Pareto frontier: models where no other model scores at least as well on both axes and strictly better on one. The shaded corner marks the most attractive combination of cost and performance.
Overall index
Performance across models
Category-normalized validation index. Higher is better.
Top 12
1Anthropic: Fable 5.1
85.1
2OpenAI: GPT-6 Astra
85.1
3Anthropic: Opus 5
83.4
4OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
81.6
5Anthropic: Sonnet 5
79.0
6OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra
78.1
7MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code
72.9
8NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra
69.5
9Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
67.7
10Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash
66.0
11DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2
60.8
12Anthropic: Haiku 4.5
56.3
Overall index
All model results
Every model in the final run, ranked by validation index, with cost and task duration alongside.